According to the DOJ, I am not entitled to the information because Peters did not consent and there was no showing that the public disclosure outweighs Peters' privacy interests.Philip's got a good blog going over at MS Litigation Review, and I suggest y'all check out both the article linked above and the blog as a whole.
Busted!
1 hour ago
1 comment:
What, exactly, is Peters' privacy interest? Avoiding embarrassment? Surely we're past that. Seriously.
Post a Comment