Similar pro-Scruggs sentiments came out early on Tim Balducci (as he was the only one with contact with Lackey - by design, I might add).
I fail to see how musing that Ed Peters may (deliberately or not) be a terrible witness for the Feds is in any way "pro-Scruggs." Scruggs already pled guilty to attempting to bribe DeLaughter. How on God's green Earth would the testimony of Ed Peters at this trial matter one whit to Scruggs now?
Posts
2 comments:
Maybe my blogmate is secretly in cahoots with Sarah Palin. YP says she's connected with Dick Scruggs, too.
I was shocked to discover you were pro-Scruggs, Matt. What do you do with all the wealth that comes with that?
Post a Comment